« A Proposed Resolution in Response to the New IMB "Guidelines." | Main | Summer Fun and A Change of Pace in Ministry »

May 11, 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451d87169e200d83513c13253ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Weekend Ramblings . . . :

Comments

David Cecil

It is sad, to me, that Church time and Family time are mutually exclusive. Church is now just another activity, competing with ballet, soccer, scouts, etc. Good insight into the repercussions of the message coming out of agencies like Focus on the Family; I don't think this result was intended by them.

As for Fred Thompson, do you think a Republican candidate can win on the heels of the public mood concerning President Bush? I cannot help but wonder if a good Republican candidate would be wasted this go-around, and should instead wait four years to challenge a Democrat incumbent. My thoughts are on Bob Dole's campaign in 1996, which seemed like a waste to me. Of course, if the popular mood is happy with a Democrat incumbent in 4 years' time, then that would be a waste too. I just can't help but think how the elections are not just about the best person for the job, but timing as well. Kind of like the Dallas Mavericks losing to an eighth-seeded team because that team became hot at the end of the season, and Dallas was not quite as hot. Uh oh, I seem to be rambling...

Paul

You know, I've seen a whole lot (I mean a whole lot of cohabitation - even among professing Christians - in my 13 years of ministry. Sadly, studies also show that couples who cohabitate before marriage are at a much greater risk of marital failure. I had a pretty lengthy conversation with a young lady not too long ago and she couldn't believe my wife and I didn't live together before we got married and wondered how we could get married without a "trial run." She was very surprised to find out that we would have been at a greater risk of divorce had we taken that view of marriage. I figure I'm preaching to the choir here, but I'm not too naive to think that there might be someone who reads here who views cohabitation as a real option and I just want to reinforce that even secular studies indicate it is a big mistake.

Regarding family time and church involvement, somehow I wish we (or at least I) could effectively communicate a view of church as so much more than another "activity," but as a way of living together. I think the popular notion of church works hard against that and the church has probably done its fair share of fostering those notions. I'll look forward to reading more of your thoughts on that in the future.

Lee

I hope that the San Antonio convention expresses itself clearly on the issue of doctrine and cooperation, and recognizes the diversity that exists within the SBC. It is a diversity that I believe can coexist in the same convention, and even in the same church, if we are united in the Spirit, under the authority of the scripture.

Kevin Bussey

Alan,

Blessings to you. I read some of your debate but I'm staying out of it and I feel your pain.

Joe Kennedy

Better the Bears than the Biscuits. What kind of name is that, anyway?

Kyle

I skimmed.
However, it occurs to me that if the drop in the divorce rate is due to people moving in together, then the problem is in clarity of terms. Biblically speaking, "moving in together" is called marriage (see Isaac and Rebekah in Genesis). If these marriages were counted, I suspect the divorce rate would hardly be listed as "dropping."

The comments to this entry are closed.

Notes

All About Montgomery